PORRITTINC
( LAYTON, UT )
SPECIFICATION · EDGE THREAT DETECTION

Edge decision,
human
call.

Events fuse locally into a single track with confidence, then a human sees one alert with context rather than ten thousand hours of footage.

← Back to Edge Threat Detection

DESIGN TARGET · NOT MEASURED PERFORMANCE

Figures on this page are engineering design targets and reference-architecture values, not measured results from operating hardware. They state what the design is being engineered to achieve. Verified performance data will replace them as systems are built and tested. Nothing here should be relied upon as a performance warranty.

Design basis
FUSION

Multi-sensor track

Optical, acoustic, and seismic events correlate into one track with a confidence estimate rather than three independent alarms.

SUPPRESSION

Nuisance rejection

Wildlife, weather, and routine site activity are learned and suppressed. An alarm system that cries wolf is worse than no alarm system.

PRESENTATION

One alert, with context

The operator receives the track, its evidence, and its confidence — enough to make a judgement in seconds.

AUTHORITY

Human decides

Detection is automated. Judgement is not. No automated response, no engagement, no action taken without a human decision.

Design targets
1
Alert with context
FUSED
Multi-sensor
LEARNED
Nuisance rejection
HUMAN
Decision authority
Scope and boundaries

This layer produces decision support for a human operator. It has no actuation capability and is not designed, offered, or intended for autonomous response of any kind.

Discuss the details.

Specifications evolve as the design matures. Contact us for current status and integration requirements.

CONTACT TIMOTHY → Back to Edge Threat Detection →