<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Industry Insights &#8211; Porritt Inc.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://porrittinc.com/industry-insights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://porrittinc.com</link>
	<description>The Future of Sustainable Energy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:37:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The $293 Million Question: Can AI Actually Replace a Senior Process Engineer’s Gap Analysis?</title>
		<link>https://porrittinc.com/ai-replace-process-engineer-gap-analysis-normex-doe/</link>
					<comments>https://porrittinc.com/ai-replace-process-engineer-gap-analysis-normex-doe/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Porritt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI in Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gap analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genesis Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORMEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAGAGEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://porrittinc.com/?p=2311</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[DOE’s $293M Genesis Mission funds AI for science. Can a one-person engineering company from Salt Lake City compete against Google, Microsoft, and J.P. Morgan-backed startups? Here’s the case.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://porrittinc.com/ai-replace-process-engineer-gap-analysis-normex-doe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Oil &#038; Gas Companies Are Still Managing Standards in Excel — and What It’s Costing Them</title>
		<link>https://porrittinc.com/oil-gas-standards-management-excel-cost/</link>
					<comments>https://porrittinc.com/oil-gas-standards-management-excel-cost/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Porritt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA RMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Excel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORMEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAGAGEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards management]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://porrittinc.com/?p=2310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Most refineries track engineering standards compliance in Excel. Here’s what that’s actually costing them — and why AI-assisted gap analysis is the alternative that fits.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://porrittinc.com/oil-gas-standards-management-excel-cost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>OSHA’s 2026 Fine Increase Just Hit — $165,514 Per Willful PSM Violation</title>
		<link>https://porrittinc.com/osha-2026-fine-increase-psm-willful-violation/</link>
					<comments>https://porrittinc.com/osha-2026-fine-increase-psm-willful-violation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Porritt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enforcement 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAGAGEP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://porrittinc.com/?p=2306</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OSHA’s 2026 penalties hit: $165,514 per willful PSM violation (+3.1%). Expanded enforcement targets energy and chemical manufacturing.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://porrittinc.com/osha-2026-fine-increase-psm-willful-violation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The EPA’s Regulatory Pendulum: Why the STAA Rollback Changes the Compliance Calculus for Every Refinery in America</title>
		<link>https://porrittinc.com/epa-rmp-staa-rollback-compliance-calculus-refineries-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://porrittinc.com/epa-rmp-staa-rollback-compliance-calculus-refineries-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Porritt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI in Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORMEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAGAGEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STAA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://porrittinc.com/?p=2302</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[EPA’s proposed STAA rollback creates a compliance dilemma for every refinery with a PHA due in 2026. Four RMP rules in eight years. Here’s how to build flexible compliance infrastructure for regulatory volatility.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://porrittinc.com/epa-rmp-staa-rollback-compliance-calculus-refineries-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>$293 Million for AI in Science — Why DOE’s Genesis Mission Matters for Industrial Engineering</title>
		<link>https://porrittinc.com/doe-genesis-mission-293m-ai-industrial-engineering/</link>
					<comments>https://porrittinc.com/doe-genesis-mission-293m-ai-industrial-engineering/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Porritt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI in Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genesis Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORMEX]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://porrittinc.com/?p=2305</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[DOE’s Genesis Mission puts $293M behind AI-driven science. Phase I awards of $500K–$750K are due April 28. Here’s why industrial engineering AI belongs in the conversation.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://porrittinc.com/doe-genesis-mission-293m-ai-industrial-engineering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Just Proposed Rolling Back the STAA Requirement — Here’s What That Means for Your Next PHA</title>
		<link>https://porrittinc.com/epa-rmp-staa-rollback-2026-pha-impact/</link>
					<comments>https://porrittinc.com/epa-rmp-staa-rollback-2026-pha-impact/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Porritt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAGAGEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory rollback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCCAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STAA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://porrittinc.com/?p=2296</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[EPA's Feb 2026 proposed rule would rescind the STAA requirement from the RMP SCCAP final rule, saving industry $234.7-240.3M annually. Comment period extended to May 11. Here's the compliance strategy dilemma.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://porrittinc.com/epa-rmp-staa-rollback-2026-pha-impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>98% of Manufacturers Are Exploring AI. Only 20% Are Ready. The Gap Is the Opportunity.</title>
		<link>https://porrittinc.com/manufacturing-ai-adoption-gap-98-percent-exploring-20-percent-ready/</link>
					<comments>https://porrittinc.com/manufacturing-ai-adoption-gap-98-percent-exploring-20-percent-ready/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Porritt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI in Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital transformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORMEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process engineering]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://porrittinc.com/?p=2298</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[98% of manufacturers exploring AI, only 20% ready to deploy at scale. The $34.18B AI manufacturing market is missing the engineering and compliance workflows that eat 40% of process engineers' time.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://porrittinc.com/manufacturing-ai-adoption-gap-98-percent-exploring-20-percent-ready/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Race to Power AI: Why Helion’s Direct Energy Conversion Is the Fastest Path to Fusion Electricity</title>
		<link>https://porrittinc.com/helion-fusion-direct-energy-conversion-ai-power-race-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://porrittinc.com/helion-fusion-direct-energy-conversion-ai-power-race-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Porritt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI in Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI data centers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commonwealth Fusion Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct energy conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field-reversed configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helion Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plasma physics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://porrittinc.com/?p=2312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AI data centers will consume 1,100 TWh in 2026 — Japan’s entire output. Helion Energy’s field-reversed configuration with direct magnetic energy conversion eliminates the thermal cycle entirely. No steam. No turbine. 150M°C D-T fusion demonstrated Feb 2026. 50 MW Orion plant building now. Grid power by 2028.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://porrittinc.com/helion-fusion-direct-energy-conversion-ai-power-race-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Reactor That Can’t Melt Down Is Already Being Built: X-energy’s Xe-100 and the Race to Power Both AI and Industry</title>
		<link>https://porrittinc.com/x-energy-xe-100-triso-fission-reactor-ai-industrial-power-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://porrittinc.com/x-energy-xe-100-triso-fission-reactor-ai-industrial-power-2026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Porritt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI in Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI data centers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decarbonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOE ARDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Chemical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTGR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kairos Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pebble bed reactor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TerraPower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xe-100]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://porrittinc.com/?p=2313</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[X-energy’s Xe-100 uses TRISO pebble-bed fuel that physically cannot melt down — SiC integrity holds to 1,600°C with no active cooling. 750°C helium outlet serves both electricity (76 MWe/module) and industrial process heat. DOE ARDP backed ($2.5B). Amazon invested $700M. Dow Chemical plant under construction in Seadrift, TX. The only advanced reactor that powers both data centers and refineries from the same platform.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://porrittinc.com/x-energy-xe-100-triso-fission-reactor-ai-industrial-power-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
